11
Feb
2024

OLG Schleswig Rules: No Additional Claims for Unclear Cost Calculations in Service Descriptions

In a landmark ruling on December 9, 2022 (Case No. 1 U 29/21), the Schleswig Higher Regional Court clarified that contractors cannot easily claim additional compensation due to higher costs in cases of unclear cost calculations in service descriptions. The decision emphasizes the necessity for contractors to address any ambiguities before submitting their offers, rather than relying on subsequent adjustments to compensation.

The case highlights the contractor’s obligation to actively seek clarification if the service description does not provide a clear basis for reliable calculation. This follows the jurisprudence of the Federal Court of Justice, which has previously underscored the importance of careful examination and clarification of service descriptions (BGH, Judgment of June 25, 1987 – VII ZR 107/86).

Key points of the judgment include the inadmissibility of “shooting in the dark” calculations, the inapplicability of § 2 Abs. 5 VOB/B regulation for services already covered by the contract, and the significance of communication between contractor and client regarding differing interpretations of the service description.

This ruling provides essential guidelines for the construction industry and highlights the importance of proactive clarification of questions before bid submission. It illustrates that thorough examination and open communication are crucial to avoid later conflicts over additional claims and cost overruns.

Wir nutzen essenzielle Cookies auf unserer Website.
Personenbezogene Daten können verarbeitet werden (z. B. IP-Adressen), z. B. für personalisierte Anzeigen und Inhalte oder Anzeigen- und Inhaltsmessung. Weitere Informationen über die Verwendung Ihrer Daten finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.
Einige Services verarbeiten personenbezogene Daten in den USA. Mit Ihrer Einwilligung zur Nutzung dieser Services stimmen Sie auch der Verarbeitung Ihrer Daten in den USA gemäß Art. 49 (1) lit. a DSGVO zu. Der EuGH stuft die USA als Land mit unzureichendem Datenschutz nach EU-Standards ein. So besteht etwa das Risiko, dass US-Behörden personenbezogene Daten in Überwachungsprogrammen verarbeiten, ohne bestehende Klagemöglichkeit für Europäer.