08
Jun
2025

RVG Reform from June 1, 2025: What Lawyers and Clients Need to Know

On June 1, 2025, Germany will implement a significant update to the Law on Lawyers’ Remuneration (Rechtsanwaltsvergütungsgesetz – RVG). As part of the broader KostBRÄG 2025 reform, the new rules affect how attorney fees are calculated and how legal costs are structured in various types of proceedings.

While seemingly technical, this reform has practical implications for legal professionals, clients, and anyone involved in civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings in Germany.

Adapting Fees to Economic Reality

A key goal of the reform is to adjust lawyer remuneration rates in line with inflation and operational costs. Law firms have been experiencing rising expenses for office space, staffing, and administration, and the RVG update reflects these pressures.

The reform includes a general increase in fees under § 13 RVG, with higher adjustments in specific areas like criminal law, administrative offenses, and family law. This is a recognition of the complexity and social importance of these cases, as well as the workload placed on legal professionals.

Clarification of Terminsgebühr and Related Provisions

Another important improvement concerns the clarity of billing rules, especially for the so-called Terminsgebühr — the fee for court hearings and discussions. Previously, there were legal ambiguities about whether informal or preliminary proceedings triggered this fee.

As of June 2025, the law explicitly includes non-formal court discussions (e.g., Erörterungstermine) as compensable events. This change better reflects the modern reality of legal practice, where many disputes are resolved out of court or via negotiated settlements.

Reform of Legal Aid (PKH)

Significant updates also affect legal aid (Prozesskostenhilfe – PKH) and court-appointed representation. The reform increases the percentage of fees that appointed lawyers can claim — bringing them closer to the compensation of privately hired attorneys.

This adjustment aims to enhance equal access to justice and to incentivize experienced lawyers to take on legally aided clients, especially in complex or sensitive matters.

Clear Transitional Provisions

To ensure a smooth transition, the updated RVG includes precise transitional rules:

  • For mandates issued before June 1, 2025, the old fee schedule applies — provided the appointment was unconditional.

  • For mandates issued or activated on or after June 1, the new rates apply.

  • Conditional contracts take effect based on the actual date the condition is fulfilled.

In cases of amended claims or counterclaims, the law ensures consistent application — avoiding a split in fee regimes within the same case.

Practical Consequences for Legal Professionals

For law firms and practitioners, the reform requires updating internal templates, contracts, fee tables, and communication practices. It also means proactively informing clients about possible cost increases — particularly for ongoing or upcoming cases around the June 1 cutoff date.

For clients, this reform may lead to moderate increases in legal costs, depending on the complexity and value of their case. Clear explanation of fee structures will be key to maintaining trust and transparency.


In summary, the 2025 RVG reform represents a move toward greater fairness, predictability, and modernization in the way legal services are compensated in Germany. It strengthens the legal profession and offers a clearer framework for both lawyers and clients.

Wir nutzen essenzielle Cookies auf unserer Website.
Personenbezogene Daten können verarbeitet werden (z. B. IP-Adressen), z. B. für personalisierte Anzeigen und Inhalte oder Anzeigen- und Inhaltsmessung. Weitere Informationen über die Verwendung Ihrer Daten finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.
Einige Services verarbeiten personenbezogene Daten in den USA. Mit Ihrer Einwilligung zur Nutzung dieser Services stimmen Sie auch der Verarbeitung Ihrer Daten in den USA gemäß Art. 49 (1) lit. a DSGVO zu. Der EuGH stuft die USA als Land mit unzureichendem Datenschutz nach EU-Standards ein. So besteht etwa das Risiko, dass US-Behörden personenbezogene Daten in Überwachungsprogrammen verarbeiten, ohne bestehende Klagemöglichkeit für Europäer.